Open your to-do app right now. Count the tasks you've planned for today. Now count the ones you actually completed yesterday. If the ratio makes you uncomfortable, you're not alone. You're experiencing one of the most well-documented cognitive biases in psychology.
It's called the planning fallacy, and it's been quietly sabotaging your productivity since the day you started using a task manager.
What is the planning fallacy?
The planning fallacy was first described by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in 1979. In simple terms, it's our tendency to underestimate how long tasks will take, how much they'll cost, and how likely they are to go wrong, while simultaneously overestimating the benefits.
It's not about laziness. It's not about poor discipline. It's a structural flaw in how the human brain makes predictions about future behaviour. Even people who know about the planning fallacy still fall for it.
The key insight: When you plan your day, you're imagining the best-case scenario. When you live your day, you're dealing with the real one.
The numbers don't lie
Research consistently shows that people overplan by a factor of roughly 2 to 3. If you plan 8 tasks, you'll finish 3 or 4. This isn't a personal failing. It's the default human operating system.
The problem isn't that you plan too much. The problem is that no one shows you the gap between your plan and your reality. And that's where most productivity apps fail.
Why productivity apps make it worse
Most task managers are designed to make planning feel good. They give you a clean inbox, satisfying animations when you check things off, and streaks that reward consistency.
But here's what they don't do:
- They don't track how many tasks you planned versus completed
- They don't flag when you're consistently overplanning
- They don't show you your actual completion rate over time
- They don't differentiate between tasks you planned in advance and ones you added last-minute
This means you can use a productivity app for years without ever confronting the planning fallacy. You just keep planning 8 tasks, finishing 3, and wondering why you feel behind.
Displyn tracks what you planned versus what you actually did. Your completion rate, same-day task ratio, and behavioural patterns are all visible, locked, and honest. Nyla reflects these patterns back to you so you can adjust your planning to match your reality.
The fix: Reference class forecasting
Kahneman's solution to the planning fallacy is something called reference class forecasting. Instead of estimating how long a task will take based on your gut feeling, you look at how long similar tasks actually took in the past.
For individuals, this means tracking your actual behaviour over time and using that data to inform future plans. If your historical completion rate is 40%, planning 5 tasks instead of 12 isn't pessimistic. It's accurate.
Three practical steps
- Track your completion rate for two weeks. Don't change anything about how you plan. Just observe the gap between intention and action.
- Reduce your daily plan by 40%. If you normally plan 8 tasks, plan 5. The goal is to finish what you start, not to have the longest list.
- Review weekly, not daily. Daily reviews amplify guilt. Weekly reviews reveal patterns. Look at which days, times, and task types have the highest drop-off rates.
Why honest tracking changes behaviour
Here's the counterintuitive finding: people who see their real numbers don't plan less. They plan better. When you know your completion rate is 40%, you start prioritising differently. You batch small tasks. You protect time for deep work. You stop adding aspirational items that you know you won't reach.
The planning fallacy thrives in darkness. Data is the light.
Enjoyed this? Get weekly insights.
Behavioural science meets real talk. One email a week.